The sometimes heated internal debate over external
communication of ADI's current non-financial performance and our specific long
term goals ended abruptly when Ray Stata, our CEO, included the five-year
Corporate Scorecard in an article that he published in the Sloan Management
Review (see relevant excerpts
from Ray's SMR article). Here is how Ray described it:
"Using the
half-life concept, at Analog Devices we set very aggressive
five-year goals for quality Improvement (see Table 1). The results of
continuous improvement with nine to twelve month half lives
over an extended period are awesome. The first reaction of our organization was
to recoil from what looked like unrealistic objectives. But we reminded our
managers that if a company really gets its quality improvement act together,
there is no fundamental reason why these goals cannot be achieved. There are
companies in Japan already operating at these levels on some of these
measures."

This article sent a strong message from
Analog's CEO. To customers, it offered proof that we were committed to
improving their satisfaction and were confident enough to make that commitment
public by publishing data that heretofore was considered highly proprietary in
the semiconductor industry. To Analog's employees, it cemented our
commitment to manage by fact and to use non-financial metrics as a major data
source in that pursuit.
All presentations that I gave while at
Analog, both internally and externally, used the most current actual data rather
than disguised or indexed versions. I always received positive feedback on
this practice and I'm unaware of even a single instance in which this practice
had an adverse impact on our business.