The Fifth Fitness, a New Quality Dimension©by Arthur M. Schneiderman What exactly is “Quality”? Ask this question to a group of TQM practitioners and you're sure to trigger one of those endless and often heated debates. Visit the misc.industry.quality newsgroup and give it a try. You may be accused of "trolling," but it will provide you with all of the proof you need. It's not that it's a bad question, but one for which we have no agreed upon answer. The problem is that the definition is not static, it depends on where you are in the Quality journey. A good place to look for the answer is in Japan where this notion has continuously evolved over the past 50 years. There it is defined in terms of the “4-fitnesses.”*
The
4-fitnesses mirror the historical evolution of quality in post-war Japan. They contain a repeated pattern of movement between a product
(1 and 3) and a market (2 and 4) focus. In
today’s world, where many consumers take fitnesses 1 thru 3 as a given, real profit
can only be found in the short window of life of a latent need.
But, what about the future? Today
we hear thought leaders in Japan talking about “fitness for the
environment” and “fitness for future generations”.
Here, the product and market merge and are expanded in both time and
space. Out of this is emerging a 5th
fitness or quality dimension: fitness for society. The
5th-fitness is reflective of a growing worldwide concern over the effect of
what we do today, not only on our environment, but also on the people who will
come after us. For the first time in
history, we have the power to knowingly or unknowingly make irreversible changes
in our physical environment. Too few
companies worry today about the impact of their factories on global warming or
the recyclability of their products. Even
service organizations, such as consumer credit companies, don't appear to worry
about their impact on the long-term financial viability of their customer's
economies. Instead,
it is left to government regulators. But
just as excellence in the 4-fitnesses has proven profitable when companies
“own” them, so it will likely be when they embrace the 5th
fitness. |
©1999-2006, Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved Last modified: August 13, 2006 |