Home ] Up ] Next ]

Nolan-Norton Presentation

July 19, 1990©

by

Arthur M. Schneiderman

NOTE:  You may prefer viewing this presentation in 

MS Word, PowerPoint or Adobe Acrobat format.

click here to select alternate format

Presentation date:

Venue:

Notes

July 19, 1990

Nolan-Norton  Study Group Meeting

None

Participants in the study, entitled "Measuring Performance in the Organization of the Future," were Advanced Micro-Devices, American Standard, Apple Computer, Bell South, GIGNA, Conner Peripherals, Cray Research, Dupont, EDS, GE, HP, and Shell Canada.  Bob and I teamed in a pair of presentations; his, in part, on the HBS Analog Case and mine on the Analog story. 

The Executive Summary of the study was published some time in 1991 and included materials from Bob's and my presentations.  One display in the Executive Summary was used to demonstrate the linkage between performance measurement and the organization's strategy and vision.  It used materials taken from slide 20 in this presentation as an example.

The interest generated by Analog's corporate scorecard prompted a second Nolan-Norton study in which the participants implemented scorecards within their respective organizations.  This study provided the basis for the first Kaplan-Norton HBR article, which appeared in the January-February, 1992 issue.  Although that article did make brief mention of Analog's use of the half-life method, and described the experiences of an anonymous "NYSE electronics company" (that was us!), it did not describe Analog's pioneering work on the first balanced scorecard.  Nor did an article by Larry Maisel, then of KPMG, who was also part of the Nolan-Norton study.  He published the study results in the Summer 1992 issue of the Journal of Cost Management in an article entitled "Performance Measurement: The Balanced Scorecard Approach."

This is the slide package I left for the meeting participants.  I canít be sure that I used all of these slides in my presentation since Iíve been unable to locate a copy of the videotape that was made.

Since nearly all of the slides that I used are described in other presentations on this website, Iíve omitted explanatory notes.

 

Slide 1

 

Slide 2

 

Slide 3

 

Slide 4

 

Slide 5

 

Slide 6

 

Slide 7

 

Slide 8

 

Slide 9

 

Slide 10

 

Slide 11

 

Slide 12

 

Slide 13

 

Slide 14

 

Slide 15

 

Slide 16

 

Slide 17

 

Slide 18

 

Slide 19

 

Slide 20

 

Slide 21

 

Slide 22

 

Slide 23

 

Slide 24

 

Slide 25

 

Slide 26

 

Slide 27

 

Slide 28

 

Slide 29

 

Slide 30

 

Slide 31

 

Slide 32

 

Slide 33

 

Slide 34

 

Slide 35

 

Slide 36

 

 

Slide 37

 

Slide 38

 

Slide 39

 

Slide 40

 

Slide 41

 

Slide 42

 

Slide 43

  return to top

©1999-2006, Arthur M. Schneiderman  All Rights Reserved

Last modified: August 13, 2006