As we approached the completion of our
planning process, I sensed uncertainty among some of my colleagues as to the
completeness of the set of metrics that we had developed for our
scorecard. In January of 1988, I attempted to more rigorously test this by
proposing the following template (see January 1988
Goals Deployment presentation):

For each of our stakeholders, I started
by identifying their most important needs. Next, I asked the question:
"How are we doing?" For those important needs that require
improvement, I tried to identify the vital few "levers" for their
improvement. Once identified, I made sure that there were specific things
that we could do to "actuate" them. Finally, I asked the
question "How do we know that we are improving?". This type of
logic path is still the best way I know of for linking scorecard metrics to
strategic objectives.
Let's look at an example, ADI's
communities:

Analog's communities want businesses that
provide stable employment for their citizens, support worthy local causes,
encourage employee involvement in community activities, and provide financial
aid to local schools and institutions of higher learning. To be rated #1 by
them, is to be first on their list of businesses whose expansion they would like
to encourage and whose needs they are willing to accommodate. How do we get to that position? First, we must be
successful as a business, next we need to communicate with them effectively, and
finally, all other things being equal, we should share our success with our
communities through local preference in selecting our suppliers. These things don't
happen on their own, so we need to develop a partnership program analogous to
the formal partnership programs we have with our other stakeholders. How
will we know we're doing those things necessary to achieve our objectives?
We measure taxes and other required benefits paid to communities, voluntary
expenditures, and employee participation rates.
Now which of these belong on the
scorecard? NONE!! Why? Because our worldwide communities
already rate as at or near the top of their list of Corporate Citizens. We need to monitor
these measures, but they are not among the vital few whose improvement are
critical to our future business success. By repeating this virtual dialog
with each of our stakeholders, we generate the list of POTENTIAL metrics, but
winnow that list down to the manageable, vital few.